Is James Comey guilty of federal crimes?


>>DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS AGREE ON ONE THING, JAMES COMEY IS GUILTY OF POLITICIZING THE FBI AND MEDDLING IN THE 2016 ELECTION. IN YOUR EYES HE MAY BE GUILTY TOO OF SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS, SELF-REGARD AND THE INAPPROPRIATE PRODUCTION OF A PETTY CASH FOR GOSSIP REVENGE ATTACK ON PRESIDENT TRUMP. BUT NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, EVEN JAMES COMEY. SO TONIGHT, IS HE GUILTY OF FEDERAL CRIMES, WE ASK THAT. IN A MOMENT TOP LAWYERS FOR THE PROSECUTION AND DEFENSE GOES HEAD-TO-HEAD IN THE NEXT REVOLUTION SPECIAL AS WE PUT JAMES COMEY ON TRIAL.>>WELCOME TO THIS SPECIAL EDITION OF THE NEXT REVOLUTION. I’M STEVE HILTON. I’M JOINED LIVE IN NEW YORK BY THE BEST LEGAL TEAM IN TELEVISION STANDING BY TO CUT THROUGH THE SPIN AND POLITICS AND FOCUS ON THE THREE AREAS WHERE THERE ARE GROUNDS TO BELIEVE THAT JAMES COMEY MAY HAVE BROKEN THE LAW. HIS HANDLING OF THE CLINTON E-MAIL INVESTIGATION, HIS ROLE IN LEAKS OF CONFIDENTIAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION, AND THE ACTIONS HE TOOK IN CONNECTION WITH THAT INFAMOUS RUSSIA DOSSIER. AS WE INVESTIGATE THE CHARGES, LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK. YOU MIGHT SEE YOUR COMMENTS ON THE BOTTOM OF THE SCREEN AE WITH WILL READ YOUR VERDICTS LATER IN THE SHOW — AND WE WILL READ YOUR VERDICTS LATER IN THE SHOW. FOR THE PROSECUTION, COHOST OF THE FIVE, FORMER PROSECUTOR, AND FOX NEWS LEGAL ANALYST. FOR THE DEFENSE, FORMER U.S. ATTORNEY WHO WORKED AT THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, WITH JAMES COMEY, AND FORMER UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ASSISTANT CHIEF DEPUTY. AND OVER HERE, AT THE OTHER TABLE ARE OUR LEGAL ANALYSTS WHO I WILL BE GOING TO FOR DETAILS ON ALL OF THE CHARGES, FORMER U.S. ATTORNEY AND TRIAL ATTORNEY. OKAY. LET’S GET RIGHT TO THE FIRST SET OF POSSIBLE CHARGES AGAINST JAMES COMEY — COMEY INVOLVING HIS HANDLING OF THE HILARY CLINTON E-MAIL INVESTIGATION. THE CHARGES WE ARE TALKING ABOUT ARE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND PERJURY. LET’S GET SOME INSIGHT NOW FROM YOU ABOUT THOSE CHARGES AND THEN WE WILL DEBATE THEM.>>PERJURY IS PRETTY WELL KNOWN THE TRADITIONAL ELEMENTS ARE KNOWINGLY FALSE STATEMENT UNDER OATH IN A PROCEEDING WHETHER BEFORE CONGRESS, A GRAND JURY, OBSTRUCTION IS MORE OPEN ENDED. IT’S ONE OF THE PROSECUTOR’S BEST FRIENDS. TRADITIONALLY THE ELEMENTS INCLUDE FALSIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS CONCEALING EVIDENCE OR MAKING A FALSE STATEMENT. BUT IT ALSO HAS A BROADER CATEGORY, THE INTERFERING WITH THE PROPER ADMINISTRATION OF LAW. THE KEY TO OBSTRUCTION IS SHOWING A CORRUPT INTENT. WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN AN IMPROPER PURPOSE OF JAMES COMEY? WELL, CONSIDER THAT HE’S RECENTLY SAID THAT IN OCTOBER 2016, HE WAS CONSIDERING THE POLITICAL PRESIDENTIAL INEVITABILITY OF HILARY CLINTON AS A FACTOR IN A DECISION HE MADE.>>ABOUT THAT INVESTIGATION?>>ABOUT THAT, WAS HE IN FACT INFLUENCED OR IS A FACTOR CONSIDERING CLINTON’S INEVITABILITY IN JULY 2016, WHEN HE IN A HIGHLY IRREGULAR FASHION SHUT DOWN THE CLINTON E-MAIL INVESTIGATION.>>YOU’VE SAID IT FIRST THOSE ARE THE POTENTIAL CHARGES, PERJURY, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. LET’S REMEMBER WE’RE NOT INTERESTED IN ANYONE’S OPINION ABOUT JAMES COMEY. WHAT WE’RE INTERESTED IN IS WHETHER OR NOT HE BROKE THE LAW. KIMBERLY, THOSE CHARGES RELATING TO THE CLINTON INVESTIGATION.>>IT’S VERY INTERESTING BECAUSE WE’RE BEGINNING TO SEE A LOT OF THE FACTS COME OUT. WE HAVE HIS STATEMENTS IN FRONT OF CONGRESS. WE HAVE NOW OF COURSE STATEMENTS IN THE BOOK THAT IS ABOUT TO BE RELEASED. WE ALSO HAVE THE IG’S INVESTIGATION. WE WON’T REALLY KNOW FOR SURE, AND I WANT TO POINT THIS OUT TO THE VIEWERS WHETHER OR NOT HE COMMITTED THESE CRIMES UNTIL THAT REPORT IS COMPLETED AND RELEASED. SO BASED ON WHAT WE KNOW NOW, WE KNOW THAT THIS WAS AN INDIVIDUAL THAT SPECIFICALLY SEEMED TO HAVE AN INTENDED PURPOSE IN AN OUTCOME. HE SAID THAT HE MADE THE DECISION AFTER SPEAKING TO HILARY CLINTON, BUT THERE’S INVESTIGATION REPORTS SAYING THAT IN FACT, HE HAD ALREADY PREDETERMINED THE OUTCOME AS TO WHETHER OR NOT SHE HAD BROKEN THE LAW. INTERESTING BECAUSE OF THE TREMENDOUS INCONSISTENCY THERE. DID HE MAKE KNOWINGLY A FALSE STATEMENT WHEN HE MADE THAT ASSERTION AND SAID HE WAITED? AND WHY IN FACT WERE HER AIDES GIVEN IMMUNITY? IT WAS ALMOST TO HELP PUSH THE INTENDED OUTCOME ALONG TO GET TO A CERTAIN DETERMINATION.>>SO GREG, BEFORE THE DEFENSE GET A CHANCE TO CHALLENGE THE ARGUMENTS, WHAT WOULD YOU ADD TO THE CASE AGAINST JAMES COMEY, IN RELATION TO THE CLINTON E-MAIL INVESTIGATION ON THE SPECIFIC CHARGES THERE OF PERJURY AND OBSTRUCTION?>>THE EVIDENCE AGAINST HILARY CLINTON WAS POWERFUL, OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE, UNDER A VARIETY OF STATUTES THAT SHE BROKE THE LAW. AND IF JAMES COMEY CLEARED HER FOR POLITICAL REASONS, THAT’S OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. THAT’S A CORRUPT INTENT.>>UH-HUH.>>AND I FIND IT VERY CURIOUS IN HIS BOOK THAT ON THE REOPENING OF THE HILARY CLINTON CASE, HE ADMITS THAT POLITICS WAS INFLUENCING HIM.>>UH-HUH.>>THAT LEADS ME TO BELIEVE THAT IT INFLUENCED HIS ORIGINAL DECISION TO EXONERATE HER. I DON’T KNOW HOW IN THE WORLD YOU WRITE AN EXONERATION STATEMENT TWO MONTHS BEFORE YOU EVEN INTERVIEW HER.>>THAT’S THE PERJURY POINT, ISN’T IT? HE SAID THAT IT WASN’T WRITTEN UNTIL THE INTERVIEW, BUT ACTUALLY TURNS OUT THAT IT WAS –>>IT WAS HIS TESTIMONY BEFORE THE HOUSE JUDICIARY –>>ON THE OBSTRUCTION A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE POINTED TO THE LACK OF A GRAND JURY BEING IMPANELLED.>>RIGHT.>>SUBPOENAED AND SO ON. COULD YOU TALK TO THOSE POINTS A LITTLE?>>YEAH, I THINK IT IS VERY TELLING BECAUSE AGAIN IT REALLY GOES TOWARDS THE — ALMOST LIKE A GOAL, AN IDEOLOGICAL GOAL, A PREDETERMINATION THAT HILARY CLINTON WAS GOING TO BECOME PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND WHY WOULD YOU NOT TALK TO THE PEOPLE, THE AIDES, THE PEOPLE THAT WERE INVOLVED WITH HER RIGHT AWAY FROM THE BEGINNING? WHY WASN’T AN IMPARTIAL GRAND JURY IMPANELLED TO GET TO THE ACTUAL TRUTH OF THE MATTER? WHY AHEAD OF TIME WERE HER AIDES PEOPLE WHO WOULD HAVE BEEN DIRECTLY INVOLVED AND ACTING IN CONCERT WITH HER GIVEN AN IMMUNITY? — GIVEN AN IMMUNITY? ALMOST LIKE AN ASSIST.>>THOSE TWO ACTIONS NOT IMPANELLING THE JURY AND IMMUNITY FOR THE AIDES, HOW IS THAT A CRIME?>>COMEY SAID IN HIS VERY PUBLIC STATEMENT THAT THERE WAS EVIDENCE OF POTENTIAL VIOLATION OF THE CRIMINAL STATUTES. THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ENOUGH TO REFER IT TO DOJ AND IMPANEL A GRAND JURY TO DECIDE. BUT THEN HE LEAPS TO THE CONCLUSION, BUT NO REASONABLE PROSECUTOR WOULD EVER BRING SUCH CASE.>>RIGHT.>>WHICH IS SPECULATION. I INTERVIEWED FIVE FORMER FBI TOP OFFICIALS. THEY ALL SAID THAT WHAT COMEY DID WAS WRONG.>>UH-HUH.>>AND IT’S NOT UP TO HIM TO BE A PROSECUTOR. THE FBI DOES –>>MAY HAVE BEEN WRONG, WHAT WE’RE TRYING TO ESTABLISH IS WHETHER IT WAS ILLEGAL. WHAT’S YOUR RESPONSE TO THE CHARGES THERE THAT WHAT HE DID IN RELATION TO THE CLINTON INVESTIGATION COULD HAVE BROKEN THE LAW IN RELATION TO PERJURY AND OBSTRUCTION?>>KIMBERLY I THINK MAKES A TERRIFIC POINT. HER FIRST POINT IS WE NEED TO KNOW THE FACTS. WE NEED MORE FACTS. WE NEED MORE INFORMATION. AND THAT’S WHERE REALLY I COME DOWN BECAUSE LOOK, I WILL BE THE FIRST ONE TO TELL YOU, STEVE, THERE ARE SOME PROCEDURES HERE, HAVING BEEN AT THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR A LONG LONG TIME, HAVING TRIED A NUMBER OF BIG CASES NATIONAL CASES AND INVESTIGATIONS, I SAW SOME THINGS HERE THAT I DIDN’T QUITE UNDERSTAND. AND I STILL DON’T UNDERSTAND. FOR EXAMPLE, WHY IS THE FBI DIRECTOR HIMSELF TAKING OVER THE CASE, ANNOUNCING A DECLARATION AND NOT INTERACTING WITH THE DOJ? IN MY EXPERIENCE, I HAVE NEVER SEEN THAT. BUT KIMBERLY’S POINT IS WELL TAKEN. I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHY, WHO ELSE WAS INVOLVED IN THOSE DECISIONS. WHAT’S THE PAPER TRAIL WHAT WOULD LEAD –>>CAN I JUST FOCUS YOU ON THIS QUESTION?>>YES, OF COURSE.>>OF OBSTRUCTION. THE TWO QUESTIONS, OBSTRUCTION AND PERJURY. LET’S TAKE PERJURY FIRST, ACTUALLY. A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE BEEN VERY FOCUSED ON THAT. HE SAID THAT HE WAS — THAT HE ONLY MADE THE DECISION TO EXONERATE HER AFTER THE INTERVIEW, BUT THERE ARE DOCUMENTS THAT SHOW THAT THE EXONERATION DECISION WAS BEING PREPARED BEFORE THAT. THERE?>>WELL, FIRST OF ALL, NOW IT IS THREE ON ONE, THANK YOU, GUYS, I REALLY APPRECIATE THAT. [LAUGHTER]>>IT IS NOT PERJURY, NUMBER ONE, BECAUSE EVERYBODY TALKS ABOUT PERJURY AND WE ALL THINK LOOK THIS GUY SAID SOMETHING, SEEMS FALSE, THAT’S PERJURY. PERJURY IS A REALLY TOUGH CRIME TO PROSECUTE AS SOMEBODY WHO HAS DONE IT AND DEFENDED IT, IT IS REALLY HARD TO PROVE. FIRST OF ALL DRAFTING AN OPINION IS A LOT DIFFERENT THAN MAKING A DECISION.>>SORRY TO CUT YOU, BUT PEOPLE CAN’T UNDERSTAND IF THEY REALLY WERE INTERESTED IN LEARNING FROM THE INTERVIEW, WHY THE EXONERATION WAS PREPARED BEFOREHAND.>>WELL, REGARDLESS OF WHY IT WAS PREPARED BEFOREHAND, AND PEOPLE DON’T UNDERSTAND, YOU’RE ASKING WHETHER YOU CAN PROSECUTE HIM FOR SOMETHING. WHETHER THEY UNDERSTAND OR DON’T UNDERSTAND DOESN’T REALLY MATTER. THE QUESTION IS COULD THEY PROVE IT? AND THE ANSWER WOULD BE NO BECAUSE ANY TIME YOU’RE DRAFTING A MEMO, AND I COULD SAY TO ANYBODY, LOOK, I THINK X AND THIS IS WHAT MY OPINION IS GOING TO BE, BUT I’M GOING TO WAIT TO FIND OUT UNTIL WE HAVE THE INTERVIEW WITH HILLARY DONE BEFORE I ISSUE MY DECISION.>>THE PERJURY CHARGE IS ABOUT WHAT HE SAID TO CONGRESS.>>RIGHT. HE SAID TO CONGRESS HE HADN’T DECIDED. HE DIDN’T SAY HE HADN’T DRAFTED AN OPINION.>>YOU ARE SAYING THAT PROVING HE WAS LYING THEN IS GOING TO BE –>>PROVING THAT HE WAS LYING IS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE.>>PERJURY IS A TOUGH CHARGE.>>ONE FOR THE GOOD GUYS.>>LET’S GO TO THE OBSTRUCTION POINT BECAUSE THE WAY IN WHICH THE INVESTIGATION WAS CARRIED OUT, ALL THE POINTS YOU MADE, NOT IMPANELLING THE GRAND JURY, THE FAILURE TO GET WARRANTS TO SEARCH — THERE’S A SET OF THINGS THAT NORMALLY WOULD BE EXPECTED TO HAVE HAPPENED THAT DIDN’T HAPPEN, DOES THAT ADD UP TO OBSTRUCTION?>>THE BASIC ARGUMENT I WOULD LIKE ON THIS. BREAK IT DOWN SIMPLER. COPS ALL THE TIME DO INVESTIGATIONS AND MAKE THOUSANDS OF MISTAKES, NOT THAT THEY ARE TRYING THEIR HARDEST, NOT THAT THEY ARE INCOMPETENT, BUT THEY ARE PEOPLE, THEY MAKE MISTAKES. ANY INVESTIGATION CAN HAVE A LOT OF MISTAKES. ON COMEY IS NOT ON THE PROSECUTOR SIDE. HE’S ON THE COPS SIDE. IF I WAS DEFENDING THIS, THEY RAN THE SHOW, THEY COULD HAVE PROSECUTED HILLARY IF THEY WANTED TO. AS A MATTER OF FACT –>>IT’S NOT THE PROSECUTION. IT WAS THE WAY IT WAS CONDUCTED>>IT DOESN’T MATTER HOW THE INVESTIGATION WAS CONDUCTED.>>YOU ARE CLAIMING THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA DIRECTED THE WAY THAT THE FBI –>>I’M NOT CLAIMING ANYTHING. I’M SAYING I HAVE A CREDIBLE ARGUMENT TO GIVE IMMUNITY TO ANY WITNESS, THAT HAS TO COME TO DOJ. THAT CAN’T COME FROM THE FBI DIRECTLY. DOJ HAS TO APPROVE THAT. IT’S NOT LIKE HE’S BY HIMSELF SAYING HEY HERE’S AN IMMUNITY AGREEMENT. THAT’S NOT THE WAY IT WORKS.>>YOU CAN BE THE HEAD OF AN INVESTIGATION AND OBSTRUCT IT YOURSELF.>>RIGHT.>>IF YOU ARE MAKING DECISIONS FOR A CORRUPT PURPOSE. THAT’S THE LANGUAGE OF THE OBSTRUCTION.>>JUST SO EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS THAT, BECAUSE WHEN, YOU KNOW, TO A LAYPERSON THAT WORD CORRUPT MEANS MONEY CHANGING HANDS. THAT’S NOT THE LEGAL DEFINITION OF CORRUPT, IS IT?>>IT IS DEFINED FIVE DIFFERENT WAYS UNDER THE STATUTE. LIE, THREAT, BRIBE, CONCEALING EVIDENCE, DESTROYING DOCUMENTS, THOSE ARE THE EXAMPLES IN THE STATUTE, BUT THERE ARE OTHERS. CLEARING SOMEBODY FOR A POLITICAL REASON AND IGNORING THE LAW WOULD ALSO QUALIFY AS A CORRUPT PURPOSE.>>THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS DIDN’T EVEN RUN UNTIL AFTER TRUMP WAS IN OFFICE. SO NOBODY’S BEEN CLEARED OF ANYTHING. ANYBODY COULD HAVE PICKED UP THAT INVESTIGATION AT DOJ. ANYBODY COULD HAVE FOLLOWED THROUGH WITH THE PROSECUTION. I THINK ON SOME CHARGES THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS STILL EXISTS. SO WHEN YOU SAY THAT HE ENDED THE INVESTIGATION OR HE STALLED IT, WELL, MAYBE, AND IF THAT WAS THE CASE, WHY DIDN’T SOMEBODY ELSE PICK IT UP?>>YEAH, BUT I THINK THIS IS VERY TELLING. I MEAN, LET’S BE HONEST. THIS WAS JAMES COMEY’S SHOW. HE WAS THE ONE RUNNING THE INVESTIGATION. HE WAS THE ONE DECIDING WHEN HE SHOULDN’T HAVE IMPROPERLY — WHETHER OR NOT THAT CHARGES SHOULD BE BROUGHT. WHAT I’M SAYING THERE IS A TRAIL FROM CORRUPT INTENT FROM BEGINNING TO END>>HE DOESN’T HAVE THE AUTHORITY –>>LET KIMBERLY FINISH.>>THEY WEREN’T ABLE TO ISSUES SUBPOENAS TO BE ABLE TO GATHER EVIDENCE FOR CONGRESS TO BE ABLE TO GET IT. WHY SUCH A DELAY IN BEING ABLE TO OBTAIN NECESSARY ITEMS TO SHOW BEFORE ITEMS WERE DESTROYED, DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE IN A CASE? HE SHOULD HAVE RIGHT AWAY GONE IN AND MADE SURE THAT THEY HAD THOSE ITEMS, THE ABILITY TO GET THEM BEFORE THERE WAS ENOUGH TIME TO DESTROY THEM. THAT’S STRIPPED THE AMERICAN PEOPLE OF JUSTICE IN THIS CASE AND HE WAS CALLING THE SHOTS, AND THAT’S HOW I BELIEVED HE




Comments
  1. He's guilty of a number of federal crimes, including sedition and treason, but the DOJ is like the US generals that stormed the beach at Salerno, then WAITED, doing nothing. All these serious criminals are going to get off UNLESS the DOJ DOES SOMETHING!

  2. Most of this information has been out there for months and months!
    How come everyone talks about it as if it's all new? GET ON WITH YOUR JOB, DOJ.

  3. I don't believe the FBI should have the authority to grant immunity to anyone. They are investigators not prosecutors. That decision should have been made by the Attorney General and should be completely ignored.

  4. MAY have broken the law you say. The whole world knows that Comey is a liar, leaker, and a treasonous Clinton deep state puppet.
    There will be no justice and Comey will not be held accountable. Its soooooo obvious to see who runs American politics, MAFIA. President Trump is trying to drain that swamp and we all need to support him. I'm from the UK.
    KAGA. KEEP AMERICA GREAT ALWAYS.

  5. Stole classified documents so hell yes he's a damned criminal just like Hillary is guilty of many crimes that they have gotten away with over the years

  6. HR's cronies "lawyers destroyed her erased emails, then got immunity, protection from the DOJ.
    FBI destroyed evidence!!
    Theyre all guilty!!!! Hello!! what are they hiding???

  7. James Comey is guilty of sedition, treason, and an attempted coup of the legitimately elected government. He needs to be sentenced and punished to the full extent the law specifies.

  8. They tried to nullify our votes, as if they didn’t matter…. all of them….using false narratives and deceit need to be held accountable

  9. The greater question should be, does it matter if he did anything wrong? Because nothing will be done about it anyway, has anyone on Hillary's campaign get into trouble for it anyway.

  10. So great to see you again Kimberly! It must be amazing being in the Trump inner circle, while watching your ex become a communist in California.

  11. Is James Comey guilty of federal crimes? not with ARE Corrupt two sided justice the only way Comey could go to jail is if he was a Trump supporter

  12. So is Barr if these treasonous cabal leaders in CIA, FBI, NSA are not nailed for their obvious horrible crimes against the American people.

  13. The metadata on every email sent except 7 were sent to a business in Virginia owned by Chinese intelligence. That’s treasonous enough to justify execution. They’re our most dangerous adversary. The soft coup attempt she contributed to is small beans compared to the email scandal. This is the biggest scandal in US history. If she’s not held accountable, I’ll lose what little faith in this country I have left. The fact that everyone skirts the Chinese espionage aspect makes me believe all these other cases will just be cover for Hillary and that’s why Russia Gate happened – to hide the email scandal.

  14. We, all of us on YouTube and across the country at work and home… we’re all a painfully poor excuse for Americans. The founders would’ve revolted for a fraction of what’s happened before you even consider this case. But if all this doesn’t result in all the major players going to jail, I’m officially giving up on being an American after 41 years. We’ve got the people needed to get this done. If not now, then when in our future might we ever get the chance to earn this freedom we’re supposed to have?

  15. I STILL SAY THAT AN E MAIL HAS TWO PARTS A SENDER AND A RECIEVER! ,SO CROOKED HILLARY CLINTON DESTROYED HER RECEIVER END BUT THE SENDER END IS STILL OUT THERE AND IF THE CHINESE AND RUSSIAN AND NSA WERE MONITORING HER THEY HAVE THE E- MAILS!😱

  16. I WATCHED SUSAN RICE COME OUT OF THE WOODWORK 2 DAYS AGO ON A TIRADE! REMEMBER SHE SENT THE E MAIL ON THE LAST DAY IN OFFICE SAYING THAT OBOZZO🤡 WANTED EVERYTHING DONE BY THE BOOK! WELL NOTHING WAS DONE BY THE THE BOOK! SHE KNOWS THAT THE WALLS ARE CLOSING IN AND SHE IS TERRIFIED!😱

  17. THIS IS SIMILAR TO WHEN THE FBI AND LYNDON JOHNSON HAD JOHN KENNEDY KILLED! THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL THEY CAN TELL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THEIR JUSTIFICATION FOR KILLING HIM AND THEN TAKING OUT BOBBY TOO!😱THEY HAD SO MUCH ON JOHN TO BLACKMAIL HIM WITH! HE WAS SCREWING A 19 YEAR OLD INTERN IN JACKIES BED! READ HER BOOK! MANY MORE THINGS TO DO WITH GIVING JAPAN EVERYTHING!😱

  18. Get over yourselves. If anybody is guilty, it's you Goofy Goons. The IG has already investigated Comey and he was found not guilty. Besides all of you goofy Goons are self inflated Goons.

  19. MAYBE , IF THEY COURT MARSHAL HIM WITH FIRING SQUAD. THIS WILL SLOW THE DEMOCRATS DOWN A BIT AND SHOW THEM THERE IS A NEW SHERIFF IN TOWN……. AND HIS NAME IS TRUMP

  20. Why is he walking free ? This makes America look weak, ineffective and pardon me for saying this as a none American, a bit corrupt and pathetic

  21. Durham and Barr must be able to get the immunity deals revoked as this is a broad conspiracy and they must have violated the immunity agreements, there must be a dot or t not crossed somewhere or a law about the immunity was given in a fraud or obstruction scheme.

  22. What was right and wrong, I get it shes the girlfriend but she is definitely not the head of the justice department. No Comey is not going to jail because trump fired him when he asked him to drop who knows what mf's investigation a man with a lot of credentials.

  23. To believe this whole CONSPIRACY was simply a matter of dirty politics, and Comey just a supporter is so naive as to be purposely deceptive or so inadequately supplied with gray matter.that one cannot form a cognitive thought. (a drooling idiot). BTW) I also have a vintage bridge for sale in Brooklyn. Reasonable with terms.

  24. What crime isn't he guilty of? He let Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama sell uranium to Russia and then he covered it up! The Clinton foundation was paid a 145 million dollars! He is a liar and a leaker. They tried to overthrow a duly elected president and then they tried to frame him! The FBI director needs to go to federal prison with Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama! They are supposed to protect this country! Who colluded with Russia? Who was compromised by Russia? Who was paid by Russia? Remember everyone deployed. God-bless America.

  25. Why would the president of the United States Barack Obama and the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sell 20% of the US uranium to Russia? Because they hate this country and they are crooked politicians that are going to line their pockets with money.
    Russia paid the Clinton foundation a 145 million dollars. Bill Clinton was paid 31 million dollars. Then bill was paid for a 1/2 million dollar speech in Russia. The Secretary of State had to authorize Bill's trip to Russia.

  26. this kind of corruption was highly coordinated and came only from the top! {POTUS wants to know everthing we are doing!}

  27. And YET nothing has happened in three plus years… if ANYONE had done “one” of the thousands of things she’s been known to have done… WHY THE IMMUNITY OF THESE WORKERS .. WITH NOBODY BEING IN (THAT KIND OF AUTHORITY) GIVEN THOSE IMMUNITY OF HER WORKERS OUT LIKE CANDY!!

  28. James Comey and both Clinton's are in a boat that capsizes in the Pacific ocean . Who survives ? AMERICA ! ! WHAT IS AMERICA'S GREATEST THREAT RIGHT NOW AUGUST 2019 ? THANKFULLY SHE WAS DEFEATED NOVEMBER OF 2016. THANK YOU (SGUAD) ! ! DONALD J. TRUMP WILL BE SWORN IN AGAIN IN NOVEMBER 2020.MAY GOD CONTINUE TO BLESS T HE PEOPLE'S OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND HER FRIEND THE SACRED NATION OF ISREAL ! ! !

  29. Comey did everythng he could and recruited others to facilitate a COUP.
    Who's Orders was he carrying out ? He should be in custody and if he refuses to tell all then he should be HANGED. The facts are never going to be known by letting these ppl walk and live life without consequence for the Obvious Crimes THEY COMMITTED.

  30. These were not mistakes, they were willingly committed. They blatantly covered for her, allowing evidence to be destroyed.

  31. The argument of the gentlemen on the right is a presumption Comey acted alone. He did not. He acted cap in hand with the DOJ and the Barry Administration. There is your collusion.

  32. Well it's going on a year and a half since this broadcast, it's now 8/12/2019. The new Sheriff (Barr) is really cleaning house? Freemasons take a blood oath to defend each other and Freemasons run Washington DC. This is the hidden hand at work.

  33. Perjury is only hard to prove against Democraps. They had no problem with entrapment of Flynn, Cohen, Manafort, etc.

  34. Wow comments are on, due to the 11000 lies about America you defend and support, you scumbags are done. Repub party is dead. Enjoy the remaining days. Your irrelevance will b the best thing for all Americans

  35. I think Comey will go down…numerous times while doing a lifetime stint in prison. All of it, face down. Me thinks he secretly is looking forward to it.

  36. Why is USA so soft on traitors nowadays. Sh#@t. They survive and will be ready to stick 8 years later. How stupid can a country get?

  37. James Comey is an untouchable. He will never be prosecuted by his friends at the DOJ. He will never see justice until he stands before almighty God. Possible charges are meaningless since his old colleagues won't prosecute him. That is the world we live in. HRC will never see justice thanks to Comey and the DOJ.

  38. As Tucker says "Comey should have never been FBI Director."
    He's involved with the Clinton crimes big time and has been since the Arkansas days.

  39. Odd start with the visuals; why do you have Steve walking around b4 he sits down? Distracting. But I’m glad you covered this issue w/ such a great panel.
    Hillary was exonerated before she was interviewed, Comey lied about it. General Kelly was ruined for a trapped lie. So, if you’re the Law, you don’t have to follow it and you can use it as a weapon to advance your politics. If AG Barr sees nothing wrong with this, there’s a whole lot more we can look at regarding Comey. He gets fired and is able to create a “Special Council” ran by his best friend? Are there no good guys to stop this? Nope. 2-1/2 years of BS. POTUS is clear, everyone else is dirty!

  40. ☯ Somebody wanna tell CUMfuscious that WE have sooooooo Many Questions
    LuvQ'all! 🌈Rainbow Warriors Prophecy

  41. Equal Rights👮Affirmative Action turned 50+% FBI-PD's, into welfare &🐮dowry's.
    FYI: "every now and then even a blind👮squirrel finds a acorn(enforces a law)."

  42. Comey's crimes are poo compared to those of Bill and Hillary Clinton, whose get out of jail free card will never be challenged, so stick this "get Comey" blah blah right where the sun does not shine.

  43. This is obviously an attempt to start the cover up for Comey. Comey's name is on the illegal FISA warrants done.

  44. Apparently if you commit a crime BUT somehow don't intend to break the law while committing a crime it's perfectly ok. This new rule should ring throughout the American justice system

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *